In an era of hybrid working and digital transformation, organisations are looking for increasingly flexible and future-proof Document Management Systems (DMS). Yet choosing between different platforms often turns out to be more complex than expected. I see companies struggling with questions like: 'Which system really suits our processes?' and 'How do we avoid a biased preference for one product?'<\/p>\n
I like to explain how our agnostic approach leads to a choice that puts your organisation's goals and results at the centre, rather than the software.<\/p>\n
In practice, I often see that organisations already have a preference for a system, but are not clear which platform best suits their processes. I recently spoke to a financial services company that was convinced about M-Files. However, during our process analysis, SharePoint DMS turned out to be a better fit with their existing Microsoft environment and authorisation models. But it happens just as easily the other way round. Recently, an organisation reported to us with a SharePoint issue. When we thoroughly analysed their work processes, smart metadata and multidisciplinary file management turned out to be the solution and M-Files helped them further.<\/p>\n
We first focus on the client's processes and objectives in every consultancy project. We discuss workflows, document flows and requirements around security and compliance. Only then do we consider whether M-Files or SharePoint DMS is a better fit. Our in-depth knowledge of both platforms and years of experience in the field of DMS enable us to choose a solution that really suits the organisation. And that right choice ultimately ensures a smooth implementation and higher adoption within the organisation.<\/p>\n
Because of this agnostic approach, product features do not influence us. We focus on the customer's outcome. In some cases, an organisation benefits from M-Files because of its strength in metadata, simplicity and workflow automation. In other situations, SharePoint DMS is actually the best option because of its tight integration with Microsoft 365 environment. I believe this freedom makes our solutions future-proof. We keep learning and optimising continuously because we are not tied to one technology.<\/p>\n
With our process knowledge and years of experience in document management, we develop standardised sector solutions, for both Microsoft 365 and M-Files. The solution for business services is a great example. Consulting firms, accountants and insurers seamlessly connect our solution to processes familiar to us. This intelligent implementation ensures enthusiastic users and stable, secure and user-friendly information management.<\/p>\n
With this approach, we show that technology is not an end in itself. Our clients benefit from our in-depth sector knowledge and years of experience. This allows them to choose the solution that maximises success and growth. That is GeONE's guiding principle.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In an era of hybrid working and digital transformation, organisations are looking for increasingly flexible and future-proof Document Management Systems (DMS). Yet choosing between different platforms often turns out to be more complex than expected. I see companies struggling with questions such as, \"Which system really suits our processes?\" and \"How do we avoid a biased preference for one product?\"...<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":8398,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_glsr_average":0,"_glsr_ranking":0,"_glsr_reviews":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[52],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8397","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","entry","has-media"],"yoast_head":"\n